EDHS Contemporary World Affairs

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: The Magic Putter...and What's the Magic Formula for Revealing or Not Revealing Information?


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 983
Date:
The Magic Putter...and What's the Magic Formula for Revealing or Not Revealing Information?


This is a story about a golf putter and its inventor, that's probably mostly of interest to golfers, and also a story about journalistic ethics and appropriateness in dealing with personal and sensitive information, which is - or should be - of interest to all of us, living as we do in a world where so much of the information we receive is filtered through the media.

So, read this article: Dr. V's Magical Putter, which appeared on a site called Grantland that is a repository for sports and pop culture news.

Then read this response, "What Grantland Got Wrong," written by an ESPN baseball analyst

Then read this response to the response, written by Bill Simmons, who is the editor in chief of Grantland and also a writer for ESPN Page 2 (often known there as The Sports Guy)

Then I'm curious to know: Do you think this story should have been published?  What, if anything, were the inappropriate actions taken by the Grantland reporter/editors? Did Grantland make the right decision to leave the story up as a reminder of a lesson learned rather than to take it down in acknowledgment of a mistake and avoid any further dissemination of the story? Are any errors that occurred mitigated by Grantland's decision to leave the story up and freely acknowledge their mistakes?  In a world where so much of what so many people do is made fully public on Facebook, Instagram, etc., is personal information fair game or is there a zone of privacy that should still be protected?

 

For full discussion credit for the week, your response must indicate that you read all three articles and have a working knowledge of the issues in question.



-- Edited by MrsCavalluzzi on Wednesday 22nd of January 2014 06:58:11 PM

__________________
Lego, Cav (the Lego brand name was derived from the Danish expression "leg godt" - play well - and lego also translates in Latin as "I study" or "I put together"...really, one of the world's most perfect words!)

 



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 99
Date:

Seeing as Dr. V asked for his anonymity to be kept, I think that releasing this article was wrong. It gives a great insight into the making of the Oracle putter, but Dr. V's plea should have been kept.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 101
Date:

The oracle putter sounds like a wonderful creation, but being that i've seen happy gilmore i can't keep thinking about the scene, "just find your happy place." All in all, wonderful read.



__________________

Tupperware-Launch.gif 



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 87
Date:

Dr. V asked for one thing, that her idenity and any other information that was senistive to her be kept a secret. The Grantland reporter violated this one request, which is wrong, since she gave them a great insight into her invention of the oracle putter. Its harder to kept information kept a secret in the internet age, but these reporters should have kept their promise to Dr. V.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 77
Date:

They broke the bro code, never break the bro code.

__________________

1386350500_14xvunf_4v0t40u0.gif



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 121
Date:

Dr. V's gender and sexuality had nothing to do with the putter she created. It is fine to discredit her based on her claimed background and knowledge but not to out her for a piece which has to do with golf. I don't think the article should be left up on the website because it comes off as cruel and uncalled for. Although a lot of information is made public on social media websites, Dr V. clearly wanted her identity kept secret and the reporter violated that.

__________________
Zoe Kline-Koenig


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 70
Date:

lulz drama....but yeah, that's pretty personal stuff

__________________
Russel Slate


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 74
Date:

I think it alll comes down to respect, people need to treat others with respect.

__________________

Zach Taylor



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 74
Date:

its no surprise that Dr. V's identity was released cause after all its the media and they will do anything to get a story its just sad how little you can trust people

__________________

 



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 99
Date:

i think after they posted it, they should have took it down. Thats really personal information that has no realation to the article they posted.

__________________

Rina Han



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 138
Date:

I believe that if the man wants to be left anonymous, let him be anonymous. Otherwise it is just a total act of disrespect.

__________________

Tristin J Kennedy... I liek appolsoss

odd_squad_by_ronnieraccoon-d66d1p9.jpggrabhornets.gif?w=500



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 68
Date:

Today, nothing is hidden anymore. It is easier to find out information, and at any time we want to. Therefore, if Dr. V wanted to be anonymous, that was fine, but he should have known that eventually something would happen... Reporters find out everything.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 128
Date:

I believe that despite the publication after Dr. V's death the site should just remove the article. Outing Dr. V in the first place to one of her investors was already bad enough. The piece should not have deviated at all from its original purpose which was to explain the purpose and history of the magical putter. Instead, Hannan's piece solely focuses on the identity of the inventor. I understand that it is good to provide readers with some background but Hannan went too far.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard